Jesus’s Burial Cloth or Medieval Forgery? DNA Evidence Additional Makes Complex
< img src =" https://th-thumbnailer.cdn-si-edu.com/2nxknJTTfr1nVp2FRGIunATMwNY=/fit-in/1600x0/filters:focal (720x542:721 x543)/ https://tf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com/filer_public/f1/ed/f1edb8bc-9ecb-4d34-a7d5-fb225005c9a1/shroud_of_turin_4783906352_2.jpg "alt="" > A new analysis exposed traces of various plants, animals and human beings on the controversial linen cloth. But outdoors experts are doubtful of the findings, which might make complex efforts to recognize the shroud’s initial wearer Source
![]()
< img src =" https://th-thumbnailer.cdn-si-edu.com/2nxknJTTfr1nVp2FRGIunATMwNY=/fit-in/1600x0/filters:focal (720x542:721 x543)/ https://tf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com/filer_public/f1/ed/f1edb8bc-9ecb-4d34-a7d5-fb225005c9a1/shroud_of_turin_4783906352_2.jpg "alt="" > A new analysis exposed traces of various plants, animals and human beings on the controversial linen cloth. But outdoors experts are doubtful of the findings, which might make complex efforts to recognize the shroud’s initial wearer
Source
